1. The man in the photograph was hit and killed by a subway when he was pushed onto the tracks by a panhandler. A freelance photographer was able to take the photograph while trying to get the attention of the subway operator by using the flash on his camera.
2. The photographer said he took the photo while attempting to catch the attention of the subway operator with the flash on his camera.
3. I think that this was an instant that was a pure stroke of luck. It probably would have been better for him to continue helping the man instead of trying to get the attention of the operator because the subway probably could not have been able to stop in time anyway. If I had taken the photo, I would have deleted it straight after instead of having it published. I feel that it is disrespectful to share a photograph of someone a moment before death.
4. No, the photographer did not do the best in this situation. He should have kept trying to save the man.
5. I strongly disagree with the decision to publish the photo on the front of magazine. The death of a man should not be used to sell copies of the New York Post.
6. In photojournalism, I believe it is important to capture life as it happens, but in this case the photographer should have put down his camera and continue to help the man. If a person is about to die you do not take a photo of it on purpose, you help.
7. I do not believe that it is ethical for a photojournalist to involve themselves in the situation they are photographing because their aim should be to photograph what is happening in life without their interference.
8. Photographers should always avoid influencing events as they happen only if nobody is about to die. I feel that a good photograph is worth giving up if it means one life saved.
9. The most appropriate response to a photographer in this situation: Put down the camera and help the poor guy!!!
Monday, December 15, 2014
Thursday, December 11, 2014
Final Exam Review
Tuesday, December 9, 2014
Wednesday, December 3, 2014
Monday, November 24, 2014
Magazines Part II
Four common types of magazine covers are early magazine covers, the poster cover, pictures married to type, and in the forest of words. One of the main components of early magazine covers is that there isn't the kind of cover we are used to now. Many had the table of contents on the front, while others had an illustration and title. Poster covers usually only have a photograph or piece of art and the title. There are no cover lines or themes. Next, pictures married to type. These magazine covers are usually a photo of a person, almost full body with part of them covering the title at the top. There is lots of text describing what is in the magazine, placed in relation to the model and the background. Last but not least, in the forest of words. These magazine covers usually consist of lots of cover lines and cover art. Text plays a very large role in these covers, often invading the space of the photograph.
Fashion Photography
In the first video, the photo-editors did these things:
- Made the model's neck longer
- Made her lips larger
- Thinned her neck
- Enlarged her eyes
- Brought down her shoulders
In the second video, the photo editors did these things:
- Made the model's lips open and more pink
- Lightened the model's skin tone
- Enlarged her eyes
- Changed her eye color
- Cut skin from her ribs
- Made her legs longer
- Made her calves thinner
- Made her face thinner
- Lengthened her neck
In the third video, the photo-editors did these things:
- Made the model thinner all over
- Thinned her waistline
- Erased all lines
- Straightened her posture
- Made her breasts much smaller
- Gave her longer hair
1. No, it is not ethically acceptable to alter one's appearance like they did in these videos.
What the final photo of these videos is is not true. It is a lie, tricking viewers into seeing it as a real expectation. People need to stop taking photos and editing them. True photographers find beauty in the world around them, beauty that they leave untouched.
2. It would be more ethically wrong to do this kind of manipulation if these photos were on the front of magazines.
3. To me, the only changes that are ok are cropping and change of lighting. Nothing more. Changing things like actual features and weight are way over the line.
4. Fashion photography is different from photojournalism because in photojournalism, you capture what is really going on in life at the moment… You do not go back to the studio and edit the photographs afterwards to fit to the ideal appearance.
5. Photojournalism has more of a connection with real life because a photojournalist's job is to go out and take photos of what is going on today. In fashion photography, you try to sell a product, and in order to do so you need to make the viewers feel that they will look like the girl on the cover if they buy it. This is unethical.
6. I think you are showing us these videos so that we recognize how different photojournalism is from different types of photography, and so that we see where we need to draw the line.
7. I think that none of these videos are about guys because women's bodies are often more objectified than men's (not saying that men aren't objectified) and that makes it easier to find what all women want to look like and make the model look that way.
- Made the model's neck longer
- Made her lips larger
- Thinned her neck
- Enlarged her eyes
- Brought down her shoulders
In the second video, the photo editors did these things:
- Made the model's lips open and more pink
- Lightened the model's skin tone
- Enlarged her eyes
- Changed her eye color
- Cut skin from her ribs
- Made her legs longer
- Made her calves thinner
- Made her face thinner
- Lengthened her neck
In the third video, the photo-editors did these things:
- Made the model thinner all over
- Thinned her waistline
- Erased all lines
- Straightened her posture
- Made her breasts much smaller
- Gave her longer hair
1. No, it is not ethically acceptable to alter one's appearance like they did in these videos.
What the final photo of these videos is is not true. It is a lie, tricking viewers into seeing it as a real expectation. People need to stop taking photos and editing them. True photographers find beauty in the world around them, beauty that they leave untouched.
2. It would be more ethically wrong to do this kind of manipulation if these photos were on the front of magazines.
3. To me, the only changes that are ok are cropping and change of lighting. Nothing more. Changing things like actual features and weight are way over the line.
4. Fashion photography is different from photojournalism because in photojournalism, you capture what is really going on in life at the moment… You do not go back to the studio and edit the photographs afterwards to fit to the ideal appearance.
5. Photojournalism has more of a connection with real life because a photojournalist's job is to go out and take photos of what is going on today. In fashion photography, you try to sell a product, and in order to do so you need to make the viewers feel that they will look like the girl on the cover if they buy it. This is unethical.
6. I think you are showing us these videos so that we recognize how different photojournalism is from different types of photography, and so that we see where we need to draw the line.
7. I think that none of these videos are about guys because women's bodies are often more objectified than men's (not saying that men aren't objectified) and that makes it easier to find what all women want to look like and make the model look that way.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














